October 14, 2008 reciept

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="600fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>October 14, 2008 reciept</B></FONT><B>    </B><B> |     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="October 14, 2008 reciept"><B>home</B></A></div> <div> <IMG BORDER="0" SRC="1x1.gif" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" WIDTH="14"><B>   </B><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="1x1.gif" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" WIDTH="14"><B>     </B><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="1x1.gif" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" WIDTH="14"><B>  </B><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="1x1.gif" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" WIDTH="14"></div> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="601d2b03.jpg"> <bR> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 width="100%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> <B>October 14, 2008 reciept</B><B>    </B></div> <div> <I>National City sure didn't send this back to me.</I></div> <bR> <div> <I>tement that was admitted into evidence without objection shows that the amount of hazard insurance paid was nearly four times the amount that Appellee claims. [R. 2978-80]. Appellee did not introduce evidence to prove that Appellee had paid the “correct” monthly payment or to establish an affirmative defense (not pleaded) that she had paid the Note in full. Rather the case was tried under the theory enunciated in her “Fifth Affirmative Defense – Fraud, Unclean Hands and Breach of Contract.” Opening argument was focused upon Appellee’s alleged new monthly payment as of October 2008. [Tr. 11:20-23]. The first exhibit that Appellee introduced into evidence was the email that purported to show an agreement regarding the amount that Appellee was to pay commencing in November 2008. Admissibility was contested, with counsel arguing the purposes for which Defendant’s Exhibit # 1, [R. 2860-61], alleged in Appellee’s Fifth Affirmative Defense, could be admitted. Appellant’s trial counsel argued that it could not be admitted to prove amendment of Appellee’s loan obligation. [T. 79:19- 83:17]. Appellee’s counsel asserted, “Well, obviously, Judge, t</I></div> <bR> <bR> <div> <I>OCTOBER AND november 2--8bank reciepts</I></div> <div> <IMG SRC="6eddab10.jpg" border=0 width="730" height="689" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"><IMG SRC="69ebfec0.jpg" border=0 width="959" height="748" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> </td> </tr></table></body>