October 14, 2008 reciept
From: cherane@aol.com
To: Cherane Pefley
Aug 29, 2026, 1:23 PM
transcript on record
https://edca.4dca.org/DcaDocs/2020/0243/2020-243_Brief_467212_RC11202D20Supplemental20Records.pdf
affirm per curim https://edca.4dca.org/DCADocs/2020/0243/200243_DC05_07292021_095621_i.pdf
apallees answer brief
https://edca.4dca.org/DcaDocs/2020/0243/2020-243_Brief_468464_RC04202D20Appellee27s20Answer20Brief.pdf
TBelow is quoted from greentree attorneys. ou'll see below their quote are m mortgage payment in full receipts.
I also was victoris in the forth distrcit court wih a per curium affirm on my amended final judgement that orders
PLAINTIVE PREDESSOR IN INTEREST PREVENTED THE DEFENDANT FROM COMPLYING TO THE TERMS OF THE LOAN' 'COMES TO COURT WIHT UNCLEAN HANDS AND UNCONCIOUABLE IF RULED TO THEIR FAVOR'
percurim affirm.
APPLANT QUOTE FROM THEIR BRIEFStement that was admitted into evidence without objection shows that the amount of hazard insurance paid was nearly four times the amount that Appellee claims. [R. 2978-80]. Appellee did not introduce evidence to prove that Appellee had paid the “correct” monthly payment or to establish an affirmative defense (not pleaded) that she had paid the Note in full. Rather the case was tried under the theory enunciated in her “Fifth Affirmative Defense – Fraud, Unclean Hands and Breach of Contract.” Opening argument was focused upon Appellee’s alleged new monthly payment as of October 2008. [Tr. 11:20-23]. The first exhibit that Appellee introduced into evidence was the email that purported to show an agreement regarding the amount that Appellee was to pay commencing in November 2008. Admissibility was contested, with counsel arguing the purposes for which Defendant’s Exhibit # 1, [R. 2860-61], alleged in Appellee’s Fifth Affirmative Defense, could be admitted. Appellant’s trial counsel argued that it could not be admitted to prove amendment of Appellee’s loan obligation. [T. 79:19- 83:17]. Appellee’s counsel asserted, “Well, obviously, Judge, t
OCTOBER AND november 2--8bank reciepts 
above screen shot is the banks actions, below on the appellate court docket is my attorney s answer to bereaking down each payment, monthly in the appellate court six years ago with my have a PER CURIM AFFIRM TO MY CASE.
I MADE A BOOK OUT OF MY ANSWER IN THE APPEALATE COURT
TURN PAGES AS YOU TURN PAGES IN A BOOK BY USING YOUR MOUSE.
October 14, 2008 reciept
